EARLI 2015

 

Best of JURE awards

The Best of JURE awards procedure for JURE 2015 is organized in the following way:
 

·               In the second review round, each submission (paper, poster, round table) is reviewed and evaluated by peer and a senior researcher.

·         A jury reads all the submissions (papers, posters, round tables) that meet the formal criteria (best mean scores in senior / peer feedback) and scores them on the review criteria.

·         Jury members attend the presentation of the nominated submissions and judge them on presentation criteria.

·         A jury meeting will take place moderated by a committee member who has received all the judgments of the jury members beforehand.

·         Jury consists of keynote speakers, leaders of professional development courses, and members of the JURE organizing committees.

 

REVIEW CRITERIA FOR PAPERS DURING THE SECOND ROUND OF REVIEW

REVIEW CRITERIA FOR POSTERS DURING THE SECOND ROUND OF REVIEW

REVIEW CRITERIA FOR ROUND TABLE CONTRIBUTIONS DURING THE SECOND ROUND OF REVIEW

*********** We encourage you to try your best, if you would like your paper/poster/round table be nominated among the "Best of JURE". This will increase your chances for winning the award!**********